



OPINION
Terrorism: A Political Cancer
The analogy of cancer for terrorism is very apt as many features of
this are matching with the behavior of cancer in human body. Cancer has
multiple etiologies (causative factors) and same is true of terrorism.
The blasts in Jaipur (13th May 2008), have once again brought to fore the
grim reality of global and local political scenario. In a short span of time
close to hundred innocent lives were lost. What was heartwarming was the
calm with which the society handled this grim tragedy. The amity with which
the post blast situation was handled certainly needs million respectful
salutes. But political parties are what they are, taking advantage of such
tragedies to bake their political breads. The BJP leadership was quick
enough to say that the blasts are taking place as the central government is
weak, the withdrawal of POTA has given rise to a situation where terrorists
can make merry. Most such criticism is aimed at scoring brownie points,
forgetting that during BJP led NDA regime with POTA in operation, the
attacks on Parliament, Red fort and many other acts of terror were very much
there. Despite Advani’s lie that he did not know about foreign minister
accompanying the terrorists to Kandhar, there were acts of terror a plenty
when he was the Home/deputy prime minister and was trying to cultivate the
image of an iron man. Also the argument that BJP ruled states with glorious
strength are free from terrorist acts also comes to a naught with this
tragedy.
Petty political thinking apart, the world today is gripped by this insane
phenomenon, which like a cancer has spread over a period of last two
decades. The analogy of cancer for terrorism is very apt as many features of
this are matching with the behavior of cancer in human body. Cancer has
multiple etiologies (causative factors) and same is true of terrorism.
First, it is due to the indoctrination of minds, like Al Qaeda by CIA
sponsored madrassas in Pakistan. The Al Qaeda was used as a proxy for
American army to fight against Russian army in Afghanistan. Here the
indoctrination of Muslim youth was done through the syllabus developed in
Washington. The goal of course was control over oil wells in the region.
They did these insane activities in the name of religion. Presumably for the
glory of their religion! Similarly the indoctrinated Bajrang Dal workers,
who died while making bombs in Nanded April 2006, also were indoctrinated in
the RSS ideology prepared to lay down their life presumably for their
religion.
The second major cause of terrorism is a spontaneous response to injustices
done to a group of people, generally in places where the democratic norms
are compromised. Recently (December 2007) the acts of terror done by Adivasi
National Liberation front resulting in blast in the Guwahati Rajdhani
express exemplifies this. This blast was in the wake of group of Adivasis
being beaten and their female companion being molested. This was the
triggering point for the acts of terror being done by that group. Similarly
the Mumbai blasts in 1993 and in 2002 were in the aftermath of Mumbai riots
and Gujarat carnage after which some Muslims played in the hands of elements
out to do such acts as a revenge, in the name of their religion. They forget
that no religion worth its spirituality teaches to kill the innocents. Here
the feeling of frustration, the feeling of taking revenge is paramount in
the minds of these terrorists. The third major factor leading to acts of
terror relate to the injustices done in the name of nationalism, the
suppression of ethnic, regional aspirations, Khalisthani, Kashmir, North
East (ULFA etc...) LTTE and Irish Republican army fall in this category.
Cancer in the human body spreads by multiple mechanisms, physical extension,
and through blood vessels etc. The one spreading through blood and getting
lodged at a site distant from the original one is called Secondary
metastasis. Al Qaeda was the primary cancer and what we witness at many
other places is either secondary metastasis of that or is being done by
those who have ulterior political motives. In current times this is the
major type of terrorism and is the one where the indoctrination designed by
US administration and propagated by US media disguised its lust for oil
resources. The indoctrinated mind is the most lethal weapon in the World. It
then becomes supra national and is beyond the realm of usual controls. The
goal of US was to politically control oil zones through concocted pretexts,
leading to attacks on Afghanistan and Iraq. And these were projected as a
part of clash of civilizations. Here the propaganda is that the backward
Islamic civilization is the threat to the World so attack Afghanistan on the
pretext of catching hold of Osama bin Laden or attack on Iraq on the pretext
of saving the sovereignty of Sheikh of Kuwait, to defend the world from
weapons of mass destruction hidden by Saddam Hussain. This surely is one of
the biggest hoaxes of contemporary history.
Imperialism, the domination of poor countries by the more powerful ones’,
has assumed different languages during last several centuries. Initially
when the Britain, Portugal and France etc. went on to colonies the World for
their material gains, they projected this exploitation of colonies as the
‘White man’s burden to civilize the barbarians’. Then came the era when
national liberation movements were being undertaken by different colonies,
many of which were influenced by socialist ideas. This period of history was
dominated by two superpowers, US and Russia. US led camp tried to retain its
hegemony on colonies or as a continuation, adopted policies to exploit these
colonies through other economic mechanisms. To prevent the colonies becoming
economically autonomous, imperialists tried to hegemonies global politics
and the language used by them was, ‘defense of freedom and democracy’! With
demise of socialist states the language being used is the one related to
civilization, ‘the threat of Islam’.
The difference in the current times is that since a religion and a religious
community are demonized and targeted the impact becomes much more deep and
retrogressive in the cultural arena. It starts polarizing the communities
along religious lines. This clash of civilizations theory is operative
worldwide. In India the problem is further compounded due to the rise of
communal politics, politics around issues of religious identity, which has
changed the language of social discourse and has worsened the situation
further. So far, communal violence has been polarizing the nation along the
lines of religious communities. Now due to this propaganda Islam and Muslims
have been linked to this phenomenon, and the Muslims all over the world and
more so in India have been uniformly demonized. The result is that the acts
of terrorism are projected, investigated and propagated in a biased way,
totally conforming to the global and local propaganda about Islam and
Muslims. The attitude of semi-communalized state machinery and communal
parties further polarizes the society.
While these acts of terror are acting as the divisive factor, in a way they
are playing the same type of role which communal violence has played so far,
polarizing the communities. Despite the fact that communities are responding
with amity, somewhere deep down the demonization of minorities is worsening.
The investigation pattern so far has been to link the acts of terror to the
Pakistan based groups, now Bangla Desh based groups. The main pattern has
been the arrest of huge number of innocent youth. The social hysteria
against them has been so bad that sometimes lawyers, in violation of their
professional ethic refuse to take up their cases. In such cases, the dictum
that one is innocent till proved guilty, has been put upside down or it is
asserted that if someone belongs to the wrong religious community he has to
be a terrorist! In this scenario the fatwa of Deoband that violence against
innocents is un Islamic has given a very powerful message to the society.
The multiple seminars being held, to say that Islam and Muslims have nothing
to do with terrorism is good but is restricted to the Muslim audience and
not able to achieve the desired result. These messages have to be taken far
and wide, involving all religious communities.
Some social groups and communal parties are subtly intensifying these
misplaced perceptions and weakening the nation. It is time that while
improving our investigation methods we need to desist from politicizing and
communalizing these tragic events. The seeds of this cancer were sown by the
global super power so just being shortsighted to blame the neighboring
country and the religious community is counterproductive. There is a need to
cultivate amity and trust and that’s possible if we see that being
essentially the secondary metastasis of the Al Qaeda clones, the cancer of
terrorism is very difficult to control by superficial means. Better
intelligence, better policing and a deeper understanding of the phenomenon
will go a long way to overcome this suffering of the country.