BY LAL KHAN IN LAHORE

Pakistan Peoples' Party (PPP) leader Asif Ali
Zardari (R) and Former premier Nawaz Sharif their talks on Pakistan's ruling
coalition. PHOTO AFP/Karim Sahib
The resignation from the federal cabinet of fifteen ministers belonging to
the Pakistan Muslim League(Nawaz) PML (N) has exposed the fragile nature of
the present democratic’ set-up. The coalition’ based on the so-called “grand
national reconciliation” has split just after 41 days in power. This
coalition government was cobbled together under the auspices of US
imperialism and the Pakistan state to stave off a looming crisis that
threatened the whole system. But now this fragile coalition has collapsed
another failure of the Pakistan ruling classes and imperialism. The
Economist of May 10 gives a pessimistic picture of the situation:
“Pakistan is in a mess again. It is teetering on the brink of food riots,
industrial lay-offs and strikes against daily 12- hour nationwide power
cuts. The economy is slipping. Capital flight has taken nearly 5% off the
value of the rupee against the dollar in the past few weeks. The war against
extremists in the tribal badlands is going nowhere. Instability has returned
to haunt politics.”
Ever since the return of Benazir on October 18 last year there have been
mass upheavals and turbulence throughout society. Events have been unfolding
in an explosive and unprecedented rapid pace.
Such was the severity of the upheavals that sections of the state decided to
assassinate Benazir Bhutto on 27 December 2007 in Rawalpindi in an attempt
to quell the rising tide of the masses, who had come out in a mass movement
to challenge this rotting capitalist system. Food, shelter and clothing were
their demands. They were yearning through this upheaval to get rid of the
poverty, unemployment and misery into which they were being thrown by
Pakistani capitalism. The wrath of the oppressed masses was evident in the
reaction to the assassination of Benazir as the lava of mass anger and
resentment poured onto the streets and Pakistan was virtually paralysed for
more than 48 hours.
However, the PPP leadership refused to call a general strike against the
postponement of the elections from the original date of January 8 of this
year, which was done at the behest of US imperialism. The results of Feb. 18
elections were meticulously engineered to suit the ruling classes and US
interests. The PPP was made to win, yet it was the highest loser. Had the
PPP got a two-thirds majority a which was a foregone conclusion a the rising
tide of mass upheaval would have put such tremendous pressure on a PPP
government that it would not have been able to fudge the basic demands of
the oppressed who were supporting it.
Before, during and in the aftermath of the elections the State Department
officials played the main role in manufacturing this right and left wing
coalition set-up. The US ambassador in Pakistan, Ms. Anne Peterson, has been
the most active and enthusiastic politician in this country ever since then.
She has been interviewing every minister and has been dictating every little
detail in the moves of this government.
The PML (N) finance minister immediately flew to Washington to get fresh
economic instructions from the World Bank and the IMF. In spite of all this,
the coalition has collapsed. The immediate “issue” was the restoration of
the judges sacked by Musharraf. On the other hand, the different factions
within this retrogressive and redundant ruling class are vying for power.
They are in conflict with each other as they all wish use this newly gained
political power to get their huge loans written off and plunder whatever is
left of the state and exchequer. In the brief history of Pakistan all
regimes have indulged in this orgy of blatant corruption and nepotism.
But the real issue has been the unprecedented price hikes, the high rate of
inflation, and the rise in poverty levels that have shaken society. In the
first twenty-eight days of this new democratic set up, hailed by almost
every body from US imperialism to the ex-left NGO’s, there have been more
price hikes than in the last five years of the preceding regime.
Pakistan’s economy is now in a free fall. The highest ever inflation, trade
deficit, current account deficit and worst ever macro-economic indicators
are evidence of the rot and the terminal sickness of Pakistani capitalism.
The economy is teetering on the verge of a sharp steep recession compounded
by a global economic crisis. The rot is far greater than just the budgetary
overruns and current account deficit. Pakistan’s economy faces high
inflation, a global financial, oil and food crisis, energy shortages,
capital flight, stagnant ex-ports, falling foreign exchange reserves, a
rapidly depreciating currency and decline in investment levels. The main
brunt of this capitalist crisis has once again to be faced by the already
impoverished toiling masses of Pakistan.
According to the officials of the World Food Programme more than half of
Pakistan’s nearly170 million people are now short of food due to a surge in
prices. According to the WFP survey, the “food insecure” had risen from
60million to 77million in March. But since installation of the present PPP
led government food insecurity has risen at a horrendous pace.
The WFP report says: “There is a very big gap between the increase in prices
and increase in wages... the purchasing power of the poor has gone down by
almost 50 percent.” And that was in March. UNICEF says that 200,000
Pakistani children die annually because of unsafe drinking water, dysentery,
diarrhoea, typhoid and gastroenteritis. Out of the 137 poorest countries
Pakistan’s GDP percentage spending on education stands at number 134 and
health at 137! Yet Pakistan is the 11th largest importer of arms and weapons
of mass destruction.
The impact of this severe socio-economic crisis has implications for the
state and politics. The widespread violence, civil wars and bombings
ravaging Pakistan’s social fabric are a graphic example of this. Similarly,
different institutions of the state are rotting and in a state of a rapid
internal decay because of this crisis. Ultimately the intense instability of
society is a reflection of this crisis. Imperialist exploitation and
capitalist lust for more and more profits, further exacerbates these
contradictions and intensifies turmoil.
The network of the media, the state and the politicians, under the patronage
of US imperialism, tries to distract the masses from the real issues by
raising and fabricating a series of non-issues. One of the main non-issues
raised by these people has been the question of the Judiciary. In a country
where 90% of the population does not have the money to buy food, how can
they buy justice through the exorbitant fees of the lawyers and the courts?
The conflict between the judiciary and other institutions of the state are
symptoms of the failure of Pakistan as a nation state. The mass upsurge
after October 18 last year had cut across these movements and all the “civil
society” gimmickry and had brought the real issues of deprivation, poverty
and exploitation to the fore.
However, after using the masses, the PPP leadership betrayed the party’s own
founding programme yet again and started playing the absurd game of
“national reconciliation” to preserve the present exploitative system.
Nationally they patched together a coalition with the right wing, especially
with Sharif’s PML (N), the traditional party of the reactionary ruling
classes. This coalition also included Islamic fundamentalists in the form of
the JUI (F) and the ANP, the right-wing Pushtoon nationalists. The fact is
that the unanimous vote of all the parties in parliament for the PPP’s prime
ministerial candidate, Yusuf Raza Gillani (a former minister of the Zia
dictatorship), was an indication of the fear of the ruling classes due to
the threat they faced from the oppressed masses.
In the Sindh regional parliament the PPP leadership went a step further.
They included 13 ministers in the cabinet from the MQM, the neo-fascist
outfit based on urban Sindh. This organization has been responsible for the
assassination of hundreds of PPP activists in the last two decades. In
Balouchistan, where there are 63 members elected to the provincial assembly,
62 have joined the PPP led government in Quetta. In the NWFP (Pushtoonkhwa)
the PPP is in coalition with the right-wing Pushtoon Nationa-lists, the
Awami National Party. On 13th of May this so called liberal, progressive
coalition government announces the imposition of Sharia law (the Islamic
code) in different areas of the province. In Punjab, the largest province of
Pakistan, the PPP is in a coalition government led by the PML (N).
The meaning of all these coalitions is that the PPP leadership wants to use
them as an excuse, a shield behind which to hide, in order to carry through
policies of aggressive capitalism. The PPP’s federal privatisation minister,
Naveed Qamar, has announced the privatisation of 10% of shares of Pakistan
Steel Mills. This was the most contentious privatisation in which the
previous regime was defeated by the militant struggle of the workers led by
the PTUDC. Now the PPP government wants to sell the Steel Mills off in
several installments. The PPP regime has also asked the Privatisation
Commission to meet its $21billion annual privatisation target by June 30 of
this year.
In reality the new PPP-led democratic regime is continuing the policies of
the previous right-wing government. But the Pakistani economy and society is
in a much greater crisis and these policies of so-called “trickle-down
economics”, as dictated by imperialism, will only worsen the crisis.
In this worsening crisis, on the one hand there will be more turbulence and
turmoil, but on the other hand another mass explosion is also a strong
possibility. The workers in telecommunications, the railways, Water & Power
and several other sectors of the economy, have started to move in protest
demonstrations and rallies against these policies of the PPP-led regime.
These protests will intensify in the coming period and a movement can
explode on the industrial front as a reaction to the deceit and betrayal
they have suffered on the electoral plane.
Although the Americans and other bourgeois strategists are trying to patch
up the PPP-PML(N) rift, the crisis refuses to ebb. Even if they succeed,
this artificial coalition would break down with an even greater bang sooner
rather than later. Napoleon once remarked that you could do anything with
bayonets except sit on them. The crisis is so intense and Pakistani
capitalism is so rotten that the crisis is bound to get worse in the coming
weeks and months.
This crisis will also provoke splits within the PPP itself. Although there
is no real left wing in the top leadership of the PPP, the masses
orientating towards the PPP are asking questions, getting angry, and
yearning for change. And there is no solution without a socialist
revolution. This was the main theme of the PPP’s founding documents written
forty years ago. The leadership has breached that programme and manifesto
more than once.
In spite of all this, the masses have clung to their traditions with utmost
loyalty and innumerable sacrifices for three generations. How many times are
they going to tolerate such betrayal again? Pakistan and PPP have entered a
crucial period. For the masses capitalism has become intolerable. They are
looking for an alternative socio-economic system. The advanced layers
amongst the youth and workers are moving towards revolutionary conclusions.
The social basis of fundamentalism is in sharp decline Nationalism is in a
blind alley. Democracy on a capitalist basis is failing the masses.
If we look at the reality of the experience of this “democracy” for the
toiling masses of Pakistan, Lenin’s definition in his brilliant work
Proletarian Revolution and renegade Kautsky is extremely
pertinent. Lenin wrote:
“If we are not to mock at common sense and history, it is obvious that we
cannot speak of â pure democracy’ as long as different classes exist; we can
only speak of class democracy.
“Pure democracy’ is the mendacious phrase of a liberal who wants to fool the
workers. History knows of bourgeois democracy which takes the place of
feudalism, and of proletarian democracy which takes the place of bourgeois
democracy...
“Bourgeois democracy, although a great historical advance in comparison with
medievalism, always remains, and under capitalism is bound to remain,
restricted, truncated, false and hypocritical, a paradise for the rich and a
snare and deception for the exploited, for the poor”.
The cohesion and discipline of the military has been seriously affected by
the influx of finance capital. A military dictatorship, although not ruled
out, could not sustain itself as in the past. The options for the ruling
classes are vanishing rapidly. The forces of revolutionary Marxism, although
modest, are gaining strength. It is no accident that on May Day 2008 there
were twice the number of demonstrations led by the PTUDC as compared to last
year.
For the liberal intelligentsia, civil society and ex-lefts, however, it is
all doom and gloom. Pessimism and scepticism are luxuries for the few. We
revolutionaries and the proletarian masses cannot afford such extravagant
luxuries. For the masses it is now a struggle for survival and existence.
This struggle can erupt into a revolutionary movement sooner rather than
later. A strong Bolshevik-Leninist organization with a correct programme,
strategy and Marxist leadership can become a mass revolutionary party and
lead the oppressed toilers of this land to a socialist victory. And the
revolutionary repercussion of such a victory shall spread far beyond the
existing frontiers.